What I love about Madonna's song "Ray of Light" is how there's this very happy guitar line that goes on for a few measures and could be a lead-in to an upbeat croony acoustic folksong, but then it lingers on one measure too long, and then out of nowhere this amazing dance beat line that meshes perfectly breaks in.
Really, I think it's one of the best pop song openings I've heard, esp. the dance beat line.
That said, the song gets shapeless after the first 3rd, and really has no direction.
If it had direction, I think it would be legendary.
If only someone had caught that and worked with the song longer before recording!
Saturday, August 31, 2013
Friday, August 30, 2013
Conservative Catholic Book (8 of 8): Seminary complaints.
From
Michael S. Rose’s “Goodbye! Good Men: How Catholic Seminaries Turned Away Two
Generations of Vocations from the Priesthood” (2002) (p. 227):
[Father
John Trigilio remembers that h]is Latin breviary got him in trouble too [at St.
Mark’s High School Seminary in Erie, Pennsylvania, in the late 1970s.]
“Sometimes
I’d get a knock on the door of my room late at night, and one of the
upperclassmen would slide a copy of ‘Playboy’ under my door. This was the common way to circulate these
magazines, but I would slide it right back out.
A few days later one of my high school teachers, a priest, asked me why
I had a copy of the Latin breviary and the 1917 Code of Canon Law in
Latin. He asked me how I could read all
this if I just started taking Latin this year, and followed that up by
instructing me that 14-year-old boys shouldn’t be praying in Latin and reading
the Code of Canon Law. He told me that I
ought to be ‘reading’ ‘Playboy’s like the other guys.
. . .
Thursday, August 29, 2013
Conservative Catholic Book (7 of 8): Seminary complaints.
From
Michael S. Rose’s “Goodbye! Good Men: How Catholic Seminaries Turned Away Two
Generations of Vocations from the Priesthood” (2002) (pp. 209-210):
[Father
William H. Hinds] related that homosexuality was looked upon kindly at
[Cincinnati’s] Athenaeum. “There was a
group of seminarians,” he explained by way of example, “who would be sitting
around watching the television show ‘Falcon Crest’, and every time one
particular actress came on camera they would whoop and shriek and do all this
kind of stuff – acting effeminate, imitating the woman.”
. . .
Hinds
also recalled another incident: he complained about a fellow seminarian hanging
a large poster of transvestite pop singer Boy George on the outside of the door
to his dormitory room. “Anybody who’s
walking along the hallway would see this picture of Boy George with the eye
shadow and painted face,” he explained, “so I brought it up one time in a
meeting. How is everyone going to know
that is not the door to *my* room? Then,
to make my point I said, why don’t I take that poster and put it on the
rector’s door? Would *that* be
appropriate, I asked? I got called to
the carpet for that.”
. . .
Wednesday, August 28, 2013
Conservative Catholic Book (6 of 8): Seminary bias.
From
Michael S. Rose’s “Goodbye! Good Men: How Catholic Seminaries Turned Away Two
Generations of Vocations from the Priesthood” (2002) (p. 202):
[In
1993], during his first year at Baltimore’s St. Mary’s, [a conservative
seminarian who eventually transferred] was told by his formation director that
he acted like “an old-fashioned monsignor who is stuck in the 1950’s. We don’t need a---s like you in the Church.”
. . .
Tuesday, August 27, 2013
Conservative Catholic Book (5 of 5): Seminary horrors.
From
Michael S. Rose’s “Goodbye! Good Men: How Catholic Seminaries Turned Away Two
Generations of Vocations from the Priesthood” (2002) (pp. 167-168):
The
final straw [at St. Paul Seminary in Minnesota] for [a priest eventually
ordained for a Midwestern diocese in the mid-1990’s] was a classroom incident
in which a nun instructor encouraged all of the seminarians to get on their
hands and knees on the floor and pretend they were cats – rubbing their
“whiskers” up against each other. [He]
was fortunately transferred to a more conservative seminary where he was able
to receive a proper formation and education.
. . .
Monday, August 26, 2013
Conservative Catholic Book (4 of 5): Seminary system.
From
Michael S. Rose’s “Goodbye! Good Men: How Catholic Seminaries Turned Away Two
Generations of Vocations from the Priesthood” (2002) (pp. 96-97):
[A
priest] said in his [1996] taped remarks [about Chicago-area St. Mary of the
Lake seminary in Mundelein, Illinois], “Many of the younger students would be
placed into situations in which they compromised their sexual integrity. This would be used against them by older
students for favors. And these older
students actually had faculty members who would request from time to time a
friend who would come and visit them because they were lonely. And these students would supply fresh
meat. So there were madams, pimps, and
prostitutes all in a major seminary system that, from the outside, if you were
to walk through, would look very holy.”
...[A]
seminarian at the Chicago-area seminary during the 1998-99 school year,
confirmed that [this] portrait of the sexual immorality and shenanigans remains
unchanged at the dawn of the 21st century. “I won’t go so far as to say that some of the
members of the formation team at Mundelein were literally ‘pimps,’ but one or
two in particular certainly facilitated Chicago priests meeting the ‘cute’
seminarians.”
. . .
“One
hall in the seminary dorm,” related [that same seminarian], “is nicknamed the
‘Catwalk,’ known as the residence of the more fashionable gays.” ‘Catwalk,’ he explained, was a reference to
the runways of fashion models, but also reflected the campy, feline-like
personalities of those who lived in this certain area of the seminary...
According
to [him] and several other seminarians who attended Mundelein during the
1990’s, one of the big events at the seminary was whenever a seminarian would
“come out” as being a homosexually-oriented person. The openly-gay-seminarian-to-be would do so
by telling one of two of his closest friends; and sure enough the word of
another “orientation proclamation,” they said, would travel quickly throughout
the halls of the seminary, especially to the formation faculty members. Oddly enough... once a seminarian would “come
out,” he would soon be wined and dined – literally – by certain faculty
members. “In my opinion,” [the
disgruntled seminarian] said, “it’s highly inappropriate to wine and dine any
favorite students, orientation aside.”
But the special status given to openly gay seminarians, he said, is
beyond the pale.
. . .
Sunday, August 25, 2013
Conservative Catholic Book (3 of 5): Seminary gossip.
From
Michael S. Rose’s “Goodbye! Good Men: How Catholic Seminaries Turned Away Two
Generations of Vocations from the Priesthood” (2002) (p. 94):
“When my
associates at the university heard that I was on the board [of a certain
seminary in the upper Midwest],” [a philosophy professor at a prominent
Catholic university] continued, “they began to confide in me. A graduate student in theology, for example,
told me that his mother, who was a cleaning lady at the seminary, had at first
been shocked at the male pornography she saw in the students’ rooms, rooms that
she assumed were those of women students.
Her shock was deepened, however, when she learned that those were the
rooms of seminarians who were studying for the priesthood.”
. . .
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)